Bristol-Myers Squibb 10-Qquarter ended 2026-06-30

Impairment / charge

Eliquis growth and lower U.S. rebates offset Revlimid’s generic erosion; rebate cash outflows weighed on H1 cash flow.

Filed 2026-07-30 11:10 ET

Key figures · Q2 FY2026 · period ended 2026-06-30

  • Revenue$13.0BYoY +5.7%QoQ +12.9%
  • Operating income— Not reported
  • Net income$3.3BYoY +153.2%QoQ +23.9%
  • Total assets$87.6BYoY −7.4%QoQ +1.3%
  • Total debt
    How total debt adds up
    Long-term debt$42,093M
    + Short-term debt obligations$1,027M
    Total debt$43,120M

    Lines as the filer presents them on its balance sheet.

    $43.1B1YoY −12.3%QoQ −3.0%
  • Shareholders' equity$22.3BYoY +28.0%QoQ +11.2%
  • Tangible book value−$16.8BYoY +34.6%QoQ +15.6%
Notes (1)
  1. Total debt: About the summary: The summary's $42.1B is the Long-term debt line, one of the 2 lines that make up total debt (see ⓘ).

How this filing reads

  • Health+0.5H1 FCF was $3.85B, net debt fell to $31.7B, and the $5B revolver remains undrawn.
  • Momentum+0.3Revenue rose 4%; operating cash flow fell to $4.50B from $5.87B.
  • Outlook−0.2Revlimid fell 49% in Q2; upcoming pricing changes and patent challenges threaten key-brand growth.
  • Impairment / charge“H1 in-process R&D impairments of $830M show that clinical results and portfolio changes can reduce the value of pipeline spending”

Executive Summary

Bristol Myers Squibb grew Q2 revenue 6% as Eliquis and newer medicines outweighed accelerating generic erosion in mature products. GAAP earnings rose much faster than sales, largely because the prior-year quarter included a $1.51B acquired research and development charge; H1 operating cash flow, however, declined despite higher earnings. Management is investing in launches and early-stage partnerships while targeting productivity savings, but patent challenges, drug-pricing pressure and clinical setbacks could narrow the payoff. For investors, the key test is whether growth products can sustain revenue and cash generation as legacy sales and exclusivity decline.

Key Financial Highlights

Metric Q2 2026 H1 2026 or 6/30/2026 Investor interpretation
Revenue $13.0B, +6% Y/Y $24.5B, +4% Y/Y Growth products more than offset legacy erosion.
GAAP net earnings attributable to BMS $3.32B vs $1.31B $5.99B vs $3.77B Lower prior-year deal charges magnified earnings growth.
GAAP diluted EPS $1.62 vs $0.64 $2.93 vs $1.85 Profit growth was not driven by a shrinking share count.
Growth Portfolio revenue $7.56B, +15% Y/Y $13.8B, +13% Y/Y Now the larger part of the product portfolio.
Legacy Portfolio revenue $5.42B, −4% Y/Y $10.7B, −5% Y/Y Generic competition continues to offset launches.
Operating cash flow / FCF — $4.50B / $3.85B Cash generation trailed H1 GAAP earnings.
Total assets / total equity — $87.6B / $22.3B Intangible assets remain substantial.
Tangible common equity — $(16.8)B Equity less $21.7B of goodwill and $17.4B of other intangible assets, net.
  • Revenue quality: Q2 gross product sales fell to $18.2B from $22.2B, yet net product sales rose to $12.6B from $11.9B as gross-to-net deductions fell to $5.59B from $10.3B. Lower U.S. rebates, including the effect of Eliquis pricing changes, were therefore a major growth driver alongside demand.
  • Earnings quality: H1 acquired in-process R&D fell to $0.094B from $1.70B; lower acquired-intangible amortization also helped GAAP comparisons. These effects are distinct from operating growth. H1 R&D expense nevertheless rose to $5.61B from $4.84B, including $830M of in-process R&D impairments.
  • Cash conversion: H1 operating cash flow fell from $5.87B while GAAP net earnings rose; rebates and discounts used $3.14B of cash versus providing $0.254B a year earlier. FCF subtracts $0.652B of capital expenditures from operating cash flow.
  • Capital and liquidity: Long-term debt was $42.1B; net debt fell to $31.7B from $34.0B after $1.72B of long-term debt repayments. BMS paid $2.57B in dividends, while shares outstanding rose from ≈2.04B at year-end to ≈2.04B at 6/30/2026, an increase of ≈7M shares; H1 stock-based compensation was $281M. Its $5.0B revolving credit facility was undrawn and extended to January 2031.

Business Developments

Eliquis remained the principal growth engine, with Q2 revenue up 22% to $4.48B. Reblozyl, Breyanzi and Camzyos also expanded, while Opdivo’s decline partly reflected substitution toward Opdivo Qvantig. Conversely, Revlimid revenue fell 49% in Q2 after U.S. generic-license volume restrictions ended, and Pomalyst/Imnovid fell 71%. The resulting portfolio shift increases dependence on continued growth and exclusivity for Eliquis and newer products.

Management’s expanded productivity initiative targets ≈$2.0B of annual savings by the end of 2027, alongside launch investment and pipeline expansion. A Hengrui collaboration covering 13 early-stage assets closed in July: BMS owes $600M in Q3 2026, with later scheduled payments and up to $14.3B of contingent milestones. Existing BioNTech collaboration payments include $2.0B of anniversary payments beginning Q3 2026 through 2028, subject to the agreement remaining in effect. Regulatory progress included application acceptances for iberdomide, mezigdomide, Camzyos and Reblozyl indications, plus new Sotyktu and Opdivo approvals; these provide potential future revenue sources rather than near-term replacements for mature-brand sales.

Risk Assessment

  • Patent and generic erosion: Eliquis faces marketed generics in parts of Europe and further patent challenges, while seven generic challengers filed U.S. applications for Camzyos; adverse outcomes could undermine major growth products.
  • Pricing and access: Eliquis’s Medicare-negotiated price took effect on 1/1/2026, Pomalyst’s is scheduled for 1/1/2027, and Orencia pricing is set to begin in 2028, adding pressure as rebate and net-price effects have supported recent revenue.
  • Development and investment returns: H1 in-process R&D impairments of $830M show that clinical results and portfolio changes can reduce the value of pipeline spending, even as collaboration commitments increase.
  • Cash flow and leverage: H1 operating cash flow of $4.50B lagged $5.99B of GAAP net earnings, and long-term debt of $42.1B leaves less flexibility if rebate-related cash outflows persist.
  • Litigation: A contingent-value-rights dispute alleges a potential $6.4B Breyanzi-related obligation, which BMS disputes; patent, 340B and tax proceedings add uncertain outcomes.
  • Customer concentration: Three U.S. customers accounted for 71% of trade receivables, concentrating collection and commercial exposure.
  • Royalty expiry: Disclosed Keytruda and Tecentriq patent-license royalty terms end on 12/31/2026, creating a potential income headwind.

This 10-Q lists no risk factors of its own and refers to the annual report. The risks above come from the rest of this filing. Full list: FY2025 10-K.

Strategic Outlook and Investor Actionables

BMS is using growth brands, new indications, partnerships and productivity savings to bridge legacy-product losses. The investment case improves if that transition produces durable operating cash flow—not merely better net pricing or easier GAAP comparisons.

  • Portfolio replacement: Track Eliquis, Camzyos, Breyanzi and Reblozyl growth against Revlimid and Pomalyst/Imnovid declines; sustained net portfolio growth would confirm the transition.
  • Cash conversion: Compare operating cash flow with GAAP earnings and monitor rebate-related cash movements; renewed divergence would weaken the quality of reported profit.
  • Pipeline and exclusivity: Watch upcoming regulatory decisions, Camzyos and Eliquis patent outcomes, and further impairments; approvals without material exclusivity losses would support returns on current investment.

Figures are computed from the filing's XBRL data; the summary and scores are written by an AI model reading the filing.

Model 005 · prompt 9e47f58d3c

Feedback