Mondelez International 10-Qquarter ended 2026-06-30

Derivative gains lifted GAAP earnings while cocoa costs and chocolate volume declines squeezed Europe’s profitability.

Filed 2026-07-28 16:18 ET

Key figures · Q2 FY2026 · period ended 2026-06-30

  • Revenue$9.4BYoY +4.1%QoQ −7.2%
  • Operating income$1.9BYoY +66.0%QoQ +140.8%
  • Net income$1.5BYoY +141.5%QoQ +176.4%
  • Total assets$71.2BQoQ +0.2%
  • Total debt
    How total debt adds up
    Long-term debt$16,460M
    + Current portion of long-term debt$2,663M
    + Short-term borrowings$2,327M
    Total debt$21,450M

    Lines as the filer presents them on its balance sheet.

    $21.5BQoQ +2.0%
  • Shareholders' equity$26.6BQoQ +3.5%
  • Tangible book value−$17.1BQoQ +5.3%

How this filing reads

  • Health−0.2H1 free cash flow was $668M against $1.29B dividends; $6.0B facilities remain undrawn.
  • Momentum−0.4H1 adjusted operating income fell 9.5% and free cash flow fell 18% year over year.
  • Outlook0.0Management targets $1.2B transformation completion by 2028 amid uncertainty around margin recovery.

Executive Summary

Mondelēz delivered revenue growth in Q2 2026, but its sharp GAAP earnings increase primarily reflected favorable derivative mark-to-market comparisons rather than stronger operating economics. Organic growth was modest, while higher input costs and spending compressed underlying profitability, particularly in Europe’s chocolate business. Latin America provided a counterweight, demonstrating that pricing can support both revenue and profit where demand and costs permit. The investment thesis depends on restoring margins without sacrificing volumes, while funding a major systems transformation and shareholder distributions from cash generation that currently trails earnings.

Key Financial Highlights

Metric Q2 2026 H1 2026 / balance at 6/30/2026 Investor interpretation
Net revenue $9.36B, +4.1% Y/Y $19.4B, +6.2% Y/Y Currency supported reported growth.
GAAP revenue growth / organic net revenue growth 4.1% / 2.2% 6.2% / 2.6% Underlying expansion lagged reported growth.
Gross profit $3.99B, +36% Y/Y $6.79B, +26% Y/Y Derivative effects distort the apparent improvement.
GAAP operating income / adjusted operating income $1.95B / $1.22B $2.75B / $2.40B GAAP increased 66% / 49%; adjusted declined 4.8% / 9.5%.
Net earnings $1.55B, +142% Y/Y $2.11B, +102% Y/Y Non-operating benefits also lifted earnings.
OCF / FCF — $1.32B / $668M; down 5.6% / 18% Y/Y Cash generation did not follow earnings growth.
Total assets — $71.2B Substantial acquisition-related assets.
Total equity / net tangible assets — $26.7B / ≈$(17.0)B Goodwill and intangible assets exceed equity.
Total debt / cash — $21.5B / $1.72B Cash fell from $2.13B at year-end; debt was broadly flat.
  • Earnings quality: Derivative mark-to-market gains were $827M in Q2 vs a $93M loss, and $554M in H1 vs a $762M loss. Adjusted operating margins fell to 13.1% from 14.3% in Q2 and 12.4% from 14.5% in H1, exposing the underlying cost pressure.
  • Other earnings benefits: H1 benefit-plan non-service income was $58M vs a $246M expense; the effective tax rate fell to 22.1% from 27.4%. Neither represents stronger snack-business profitability.
  • Cash conversion: H1 OCF trailed net earnings, with a $509M unrealized derivative gain removed in the cash-flow reconciliation and receivables and accounts-payable outflows of $424M and $538M. Capital expenditures rose to $654M; receivables factoring principal of $585M also warrants attention when assessing operating cash generation.
  • Capital return: H1 cash repurchases were $212M, down from $1.65B, alongside $1.29B of dividends. Shares outstanding declined by only ≈1.1M to ≈1.28B, remaining broadly flat despite repurchases.

Business Developments

  • Portfolio and demand: Biscuits and baked snacks generated $9.28B of H1 revenue and chocolate $6.32B—together 80% of sales. Pricing drove most organic growth; volume/mix contributed only 0.1 percentage points in H1, indicating limited demand expansion.
  • Regional divergence: Europe’s Q2 revenue fell 1.0% and segment operating income fell 26%, reflecting chocolate volume declines, pricing elasticity and costs. Latin America’s revenue grew 15% and segment income 25%, making it the only region with higher Q2 segment profit.
  • Resource allocation: Management’s $1.2B enterprise resource planning and supply-chain transformation targets completion by year-end 2028, with most spending expensed. H1 implementation costs rose to $108M from $70M; planned 2026 capital expenditures of up to $1.4B support manufacturing modernization, capacity and productivity.

Risk Assessment

  • Pricing and commodity exposure: Historically elevated cocoa costs and delayed benefits from hedges can sustain margin pressure, while further price increases risk additional chocolate-volume losses.
  • Funding and distributions: Current long-term debt maturities rose to $2.66B from $1.30B; H1 dividends alone exceeded FCF, making market access and the $6.0B of undrawn facilities relevant to funding flexibility.
  • Asset valuation: Goodwill of $24.2B and net intangible assets of $19.5B dominate equity; five brands totaling $1.5B have valuation headroom below 10%, leaving them vulnerable to weaker forecasts.
  • Transformation execution: The systems overhaul adds expense before benefits arrive and creates operational and supply-chain disruption risk.
  • Market and geopolitical exposure: Derivatives introduce earnings volatility and counterparty exposure, while tariffs, currencies and conflict threaten costs and logistics; Russia represented 3.8% of Q2 revenue.

This 10-Q lists no risk factors of its own and refers to the annual report. The risks above come from the rest of this filing. Full list: the company's 10-Ks on SEC.

Strategic Outlook and Investor Actionables

Management is betting on pricing, brand investment, productivity and modernization to protect global snacking economics. The opportunity is margin recovery as cost pressures ease; the threat is that demand elasticity and implementation spending absorb those benefits.

  • Europe recovery: Q2 segment income of $382M fell 26%. Subsequent revenue stabilization and improving segment income would support recovery; continued chocolate-volume weakness and profit declines would undermine it.
  • Pricing durability: H1 organic growth was 2.6%, with volume/mix contributing 0.1 points. Sustained growth with improving volume/mix would validate pricing; increasingly negative volume/mix would signal demand erosion.
  • Transformation payoff: Track the $1.2B program against management’s year-end 2028 completion date. Delivery alongside improving segment profitability would support the investment; escalating costs or operational disruption would weaken it.
  • Cash coverage: H1 FCF of $668M covered only part of dividends and repurchases. Improved cash generation relative to distributions would strengthen financial flexibility; persistent shortfalls would increase financing dependence.

Figures are computed from the filing's XBRL data; the summary and scores are written by an AI model reading the filing.

Model 006 · prompt bdad6d7239

Feedback