Schrödinger, Inc. 10-Qquarter ended 2026-09-30

Structure Therapeutics milestone drove revenue growth; hosted migration obscured stronger software contracting.

Filed 2026-11-04 16:08 ET

Key figures · Q3 FY2026 · period ended 2026-09-30

  • Revenue$64.5MYoY +18.7%QoQ +9.5%
  • Operating income−$26.1MYoY +43.1%QoQ +37.1%
  • Net income−$37.7MYoY −15.0%Previous quarter $6.0M
  • Total assets$611.9MYoY −6.4%QoQ −4.4%
  • Total debtNo debtYear ago $0Previous quarter $0
  • Shareholders' equity$301.8MYoY −6.1%QoQ −8.2%
  • Tangible book value$297.0M1YoY −6.2%QoQ −8.4%
Notes (1)
  1. Tangible book value: No intangible assets are reported.

How this filing reads

  • Health+0.2Liquidity of $373M and projected 24-month funding cover current needs against $96.5M of nine-month operating outflow.
  • Momentum+0.2Q3 revenue rose 19%, and operating loss narrowed 43%; software revenue fell 1.5%.
  • Outlook−0.1BMS discontinuations left one active target; partner-led development is expected to save ≈$70M.

Executive Summary

Schrödinger sells molecular-design software to biopharma and materials-science researchers and earns research and milestone payments from drug-discovery partnerships. It is shifting customers toward hosted software and AI tools while reducing independent clinical development and seeking partners for its drug candidates. Q3 revenue grew 19% vs 8% for 9M, but milestone income drove much of the improvement while software’s transition continued to obscure underlying demand. Lower development spending narrowed operating losses; investors must distinguish repeatable software growth from unpredictable collaboration payments and investment gains.

What's Happening in the Business

Hosted software is replacing upfront license sales with revenue recognized over contract terms. Q3 hosted revenue rose 49% to $17.2M, while on-premise revenue fell 16% to $13.4M and maintenance fell 33% to $4.57M. Software annual contract value, a contract-performance measure rather than a revenue forecast, grew 17% to $44.7M, suggesting stronger contracting than reported software revenue alone shows.

Schrödinger launched early access to Bunsen, its agentic AI co-scientist, in July. Management expects full commercial release by year-end, and a September Bristol Myers Squibb agreement supports deployment and additional functionality.

Drug discovery is becoming more partner-dependent. Schrödinger plans to finish Phase 1 trials of SGR-1505 and SGR-3515, then seek partners rather than independently start further trials. This retreat from independent clinical development, together with the prior restructuring, is expected to save ≈$70M when completed. August’s licensing of two early-stage programs to newly formed Tectora for equity and potential future payments follows that direction.

Partner decisions remain consequential: September’s Novartis amendment replaced research programs with two new programs, while Bristol Myers Squibb discontinuations left one active neurology target. Novartis’s $150M upfront payment was received in January 2025—not this quarter—and potential future milestones remain contingent.

Key Financial Highlights

Metric Q3 2026; Y/Y 9M 2026; Y/Y Investor interpretation
Revenue $64.5M; +19% $182M; +7.9% Collaboration milestones outweighed weaker contribution funding and license revenue.
Operating loss $(26.1)M; narrowed 43% $(116)M; narrowed 22% Higher drug-discovery gross profit and lower development spending reduced losses.
Net loss $(37.7)M; widened 15% $(91.8)M; narrowed 32% Investment revaluations hurt the quarter but benefited the longer period.
Operating cash flow — $(96.5)M vs $30.0M inflow Prior-year collaboration collections did not recur at the same scale.
Segment Q3 revenue; Y/Y Q3 gross profit; Y/Y
Software $40.2M; −1.5% $28.5M; −4.1%
Drug Discovery $24.3M; +80% $9.73M vs $(1.71)M
  • Drug-discovery drivers: A $12.0M Structure Therapeutics milestone supported Q3 growth. The 9M period also included a $10.0M Ajax milestone and accelerated revenue recognition after Lilly discontinued a program and Schrödinger completed its obligations.
  • Software economics: Products-and-services revenue grew 6.2% in Q3 but fell 9.1% over 9M. Its Q3 gross margin fell to 75% from 77%, reflecting higher cloud-computing and personnel costs.
  • Shared expenses: Segment gross profit excludes operating expenses. Q3 R&D fell 20% to $34.1M; external preclinical and clinical costs fell 54% to $6.96M following SGR-2921’s discontinuation and reduced program spending.
  • Investment volatility: Q3 equity revaluation produced a $14.8M loss vs a $9.69M gain, principally reflecting Structure Therapeutics’ share price rather than operating performance.
  • Cash and commitments: Liquidity totaled $373M, with management projecting at least 24 months of funding. Cash use included a $43.5M deferred-revenue reduction, while equity-investment sales supplied $67.5M outside operations. An $82.0M three-year cloud minimum and $150M of lease payments through 2037 constrain flexibility.
  • Revenue visibility: Remaining performance obligations fell 22% since year-end to $187M; ≈62% is expected within 12 months. These are future revenue, not cash or profit.

Risk Assessment

  • Partner and customer dependence: Two customers generated 35% of Q3 revenue, while partner-controlled program cancellations can remove future milestones and royalties.
  • Software transition and competition: Hosted migration delays recognition, while nonbinding renewals, competing AI tools and customer-built software threaten contract growth and pricing.
  • Clinical uncertainty: Both retained clinical programs remain in Phase 1; SGR-2921’s discontinuation after two patient deaths illustrates the safety risk that could prevent partnering.
  • Funding and investment exposure: Persistent cash consumption and fixed commitments could eventually require dilutive financing, while collaborator equity holdings can lose value independently of software performance.

What to Watch

  • Hosted migration: Contract value is growing faster than software revenue; sustained contract growth followed by revenue growth would validate the transition, while weaker renewals would challenge it.
  • Bunsen commercialization: Management targets year-end release; subsequent customer deployments and software growth would support adoption, while delays or limited uptake would weaken the case.
  • Partnership execution: Watch Phase 1 progress, licensing of the retained clinical candidates and advancement of the replacement Novartis programs; new agreements and milestones would validate the partner-led model.
  • Cash discipline: Lower clinical spending must translate into reduced cash consumption without weakening software development; continued heavy outflows would shorten the stated funding horizon.

Longer version: the summary of each of the report's 6 sections, written by an AI model from the same filing.

Changes since the previous 10-Q

Since the Q2 FY2026 10-Q:

  1. Risk escalated Partner program cancellations
    Lilly had dropped a program; future payments depended on partners’ priorities. → Bristol Myers Squibb discontinuations left only one active neurology target.
  2. Watch item mixed Hosted software adoption
    Q2 ACV reached $29.6M, up 27%; sustained contracting followed by revenue growth mattered. → Q3 ACV reached $44.7M, up 17%; software revenue still fell 1.5%.
  3. Risk materialized Collaborator equity exposure
    Collaborator equity holdings were volatile and unreliable as a funding source. → Equity revaluations produced a $14.8M Q3 loss, principally from Structure Therapeutics.

Was this summary useful?

Figures are computed from the filing's XBRL data; the summary and scores are written by an AI model reading the filing.

Model 006 · prompt v172 · 2026-11-04 23:51:43Z

Feedback